Friday, 25 January 2013

Tender Writing faults to Make you Think and Smile

Firms Providing tender writing services often have a keen eye for picking up on the small mistakes which many people may gloss. Tender writing training can help new tender writers acquire these skills. And here are a few gaffs to make the point.

Firms providing tender writing services often have a keen eye for picking up on the small mistakes which many people may gloss over or not register, and having an eye for these errors. Tender writing training can help new tender writers get these skills.

However, word fatigue can lead even the most proficient bid writer to ignore some basic errors which at best look unprofessional, and at worst actively change the meaning of a document to offer something completely different in the planned result. As well as alerting the assessor to the fact that the proposal writer is either too tired or too lazy to proof their document accurately, it also highlights a flaw on the part of the bid management process for your company, if errors can slip through the net without being picked up at the proofing development step.


Let's take a quick look at some examples of how exhausted tender writers can alter meaning through oversight of punctuation...

* In performing annual self-assessment teaching, providers should look for assist.
* In performing annual self-assessment, teaching providers should look for assist.

Having a comma in the wrong place can totally change the stretch. Here's another example:

* We order products and sell the products.
* We order, products and sell the products.

Or, the power of a easy dash to change knowledge:
* You will be mandatory to work twenty four-hour shifts.
* You will be mandatory to work twenty-four hour shifts.
* You will be mandatory to work twenty-four-hour shifts.

All of this highlights the fact that all members of the bid writing team, from the suggestion writer through to the bid manager, needs to stay a wary eye on the content produced, to make sure that it isn't accidentally offering a service or solution which is not likely to bring.

The online recently held a competition to show how punctuation can change importance, by inviting readers to submit a letter, which used only punctuation to change the style and tone. Look at the following examples:

In law, there is nothing to make me say thank you, but the quality of your gifts compels me at least to write to tell you how I feel. Thank you so much for the presents! I was expecting nothing more than a token yet, again, you have go above even your own absurd standards.

It was a shame you had to stay here for such a short time. I thought I might have coped, but it was unbearable seeing you leave. The relief was immense when I heard we might see you again soon. I wanted to end it all by saying goodbye now. I hope I will not have to say it to you again for a long time. If you have the opportunity to use Christmas away next year, please do not.

There is nothing to make me say thank you, but the quality of your gifts compels me at least to write to tell you how I feel. Thank you? So much for the presents I was expecting. Nothing more than a token, yet again! You have exceeded even your own unbelievable standards.

I am an expert writer on tenders and proposal writing.
Websites like www.tradereadercom provide bid writing training and services like bid management.

No comments:

Post a Comment